This unit of the full sample course is an introduction to thinking about how we communicate about the sounds we hear in music
Assignment / Module
Music is a tricky thing to talk about.
First of all, it’s everywhere and feels like it can be anything. The idea of “music” is so broad, that it is hard to consider as a whole or as a useful category. But we’ll try.
Second, music can be intimidating. Some people get training in music, whether through learning an instrument, performing with a school ensemble, or in more informal ways, like singing often with others who know a tradition well. When someone says, “All I can play is the radio,” it reflects the doubts that arise from a culture of specialization where we assume that we cannot participate in something unless we’re really good at it. But that’s not what music is, or at least, it’s not what it has to be. Singing poorly can bring us joy or laughter. It can bring people together in some cases or, in others, our music can split us apart. Listening can bring solace or memories of grief. Participating and can mean so many different things.
Another type of intimidation comes from the vocabulary. It’s common to assume that we need to know musical jargon to be able to say something of value about what we hear. But people are experienced connoisseurs of music thanks to our lifetimes of listening. We have thoughts and ideas about what we listen to, even when we don’t have the words to articulate them.
In this module, we will try and alleviate some of these things and make it a little bit easier to talk about music.
The readings for this module are two sets of short essays in the World Music Textbook. The first is in four parts and discusses rhythm and how music builds and uses our expectations. The second is in two parts and does the same for pitch and melody. The listening for this section is embedded within the reading as links and examples.
As you prepare, know that there are six short essays here, so plan ahead and get started sooner rather than later. These essays introduce a number of concepts and terms that you will use in an assignment later in the module, where you will discuss a piece of music of your choosing.
This section uses Chris Witulski's "Rhythm and Expectation" to explore some of the features that we often hear and experience when listening to sound. It is in four parts, all accessible through the same link:
With a basic groundwork of rhythmic concepts in hand, we move into thinking about what we can say about music. For this section, you will choose among a handful of readings where authors consider how music is working by describing different musical characteristics. In some cases, they introduce and focus on ideas related to pitch, in others, the focus is on rhythm. In each situation, someone is using this vocabulary to share ideas that would otherwise be difficult to grasp.
Choose two of the following readings for this section.
This discussion has two parts, each of which gives you the chance to use the terms and ideas that you learned in the first section.
You are going to choose a song from any genre or context and analyze it in terms of the musical elements that we have covered so far. Beyond the concepts that relate to rhythm and pitch, you can also discuss the instruments used, how repetition works in form (do some melodies come back?), and the sound or feel of the music more broadly.
The guidelines for choosing a song are fairly straightforward.
Once you have chosen your song, write a short (300 word) essay describing it musically. Be sure to include material from the reading where appropriate. Make specific connections to demonstrate your work and understanding of the assigned articles.
I challenge you to try and describe what you hear in whatever way you can. If the reading does not touch on an element (in the case of instrumentation, form, lyrics, etc.), then don’t be afraid to drop the jargon and use your own words to reflect how the music works, to you.
For your comments on each others’ posts, listen to the examples and read over the discussion. What suggestions or additions do you have for the analysis? What do you think of the song? If you knew it before, did the analysis change the way you felt about it? Did anything surprise you through this assignment?
For this part, you will create some music, share it, and describe your choices. You can use any system to create music however you want. There are many options that range from game-like ways to play with a few ideas to fully-fledged professional systems. I’ll link to some accessible and easy-to-use tools below. Your description of the decision making process is the main focus of this assignment, so don’t feel like you need to spend hours making something professional.
In your post, you will:
I’ll keep a list here with some links and short descriptions. It’s not in any order and I’d be interested to hear about similar projects that you think should be added!
Take some time exploring a few of these before making your choice!
Remember to connect your thoughts for both parts to the readings in specific ways: what relates, what caught your attention? Why was it relevant in the analysis and creation of music? Without clear references to the readings, you won’t be able to get full credit! Review the discussion grading rubrics for details.
Christopher Witulski is the author of The Gnawa Lions (2018) and Focus: Music and Religion of Morocco (2019), two books focusing on changes in sacred performance practices in contemporary Morocco. He is also an active performer of Arabic and American old time music on violin, ‘ud, and banjo.
